三星 Galaxy A57 5G 评测总结三星 Galaxy A57 5G 是 A 系列的一次非常成功的升级，但与前代机型相比，它却出人意料地保守。更轻薄的机身、高品质的做工、升级后的 IP68 防护等级以及更快的 Exynos 1680 芯片，共同构成了这款功能全面的产品。 此外，它还拥有长期的系统更新保障、稳定的日常性能，以及一款在日常使用中表现出色的明亮AMOLED屏幕——尽管目前竞争对手已提供更高的峰值亮度。
Test device courtesy of Samsung Germany
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
不过，该机型也存在一些缺点：相机表现虽稳健，但在这一价位段并无突出之处；在2026年，USB 2.0接口显得有些过时，而且三星在蓝牙编解码器方面也有所保留。 不过，最严重的问题是令人失望的续航表现——尽管电池容量保持不变，但实际续航时间甚至不如Galaxy A56。如果三星无法通过软件更新解决这一问题，这款智能手机将无法充分发挥其潜力。
因此，Galaxy A57 5G 是一款品质上乘的中端智能手机，但真正具有创新性的功能寥寥无几。对于拥有较旧款 Galaxy A 机型的用户而言，这将是一款现代、可靠且能获得长期软件支持的设备。 另一方面，Galaxy A56的用户则几乎找不到升级的理由，尤其是考虑到其明显更高的建议零售价进一步削弱了这款新机的附加值。
Pros+ 纤薄、高品质的机身，具备 IP68 防护等级
+ 支持 Wi-Fi 6E 和蓝牙 6.0
+ 双 eSIM 卡
+ 长期软件更新支持
+ 精准的 GNSS 定位Cons- 240 Hz PWM 调光- 支持的蓝牙编解码器较少- 游戏性能一般- 不支持无线充电
价格与供货情况三星官网提供 Galaxy A57 的所有配色和存储版本。不过，在Notebooksbilliger、亚马逊等其他零售商处，该机型售价要低得多。
$389.00Samsung Galaxy A57 5G 2026 | 256GB, 8GB, Dual SIM | 6.7" 120 Hz, Super AMOLED Plus, IP68 Water Resistant, Android 16 | International Model Factory Unlocked for Global$465.91Samsung Galaxy A57 5G (2026), Unlocked Android Smartphone, 128GB, AMOLED Display, Triple Camera, IP68, 5000mAh Battery, US Version, US 1 Yr Warranty, Awesome Gray$417.50Samsung Galaxy A57 5G 2026 | 256GB, 8GB, Dual SIM | 6.7" 120 Hz, Super AMOLED Plus, IP68 Water Resistant, Android 16 | International Model Factory Unlocked for Global
Table of Contents三星 Galaxy A57 5G 评测总结规格：三星 Galaxy A57 5G机身——Galaxy A57 具备更高的IP防护等级和更纤薄的设计特点——与上一代机型相比几乎没有变化软件——Galaxy A系列，提供六年系统更新通信与GNSS——Galaxy A57支持6 GHz Wi-Fi手机功能与通话质量——配备双eSIM的A57相机——Galaxy A57 配备出色的主摄像头配件与保修——Galaxy A57 简约版包装内容输入与操作——板载光学指纹传感器显示屏——三星继续在低频下采用PWM技术性能——Galaxy A57 搭载 Exynos 1680 处理器游戏——不适合发烧友排放量——Exynos 1680 几乎未减少排放电池续航时间——Galaxy A57 配备 5,000 mAh 电池Notebookcheck 综合评分可能方案的比较
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types ← exclude selected tags
三星 Galaxy A57 5G 是 Galaxy A56 5G 的继任者，其最大亮点在于更纤薄的机身设计和更轻的重量。三星还进行了标准的SoC升级，并提升了IP防护等级。在Wi-Fi和蓝牙性能方面也有所提升。
在德国，存储容量有 128 GB 或 256 GB 两种选择，均配备 8 GB 运行内存；建议零售价已大幅上涨，目前分别为 529 欧元和 589 欧元。 12/512 GB版本虽未在德国正式发售，但可通过多家零售商作为欧盟进口机购买。
规格：三星 Galaxy A57 5G
Samsung Galaxy A57ProcessorSamsung Exynos 1680 8c/8t, 1 x 2.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A720, 4 x 2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A720, 3 x 2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A520Graphics adapterSamsung Xclipse 550Memory8 GB , LPDDR5xDisplay6.70 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 385 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, Super AMOLED, 8 Bit Color depth, Refresh rate: 60 - 120 Hz, Scratch resistance on Mohs hardness scale: 5; Screen-body-ratio: 89 %, Gorilla Glass Victus+, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 HzStorage256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB , 253.3 GB freeConnections1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTGNetworkingWi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 6.0, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPSSizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 6.9 x 161.5 x 76.8Battery5000 mAh Lithium-Ion, Battery charge time: 50 %: 24 min, 80 %: 42 min, 100 %: 71 min; Battery charge cycles: 1200Chargingfast charging / QuickchargeOperating SystemAndroid 16CameraPrimary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 23 mm, OIS) + 12 MPix (Ultra wide, f/2.2, 13 mm) + 5 MPix (Macro, f/2.4, 25 mm)Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/2.2, 25 / 31 mm, FF)Additional featuresSpeakers: Dual, Keyboard: Virtual keyboard, One UI 8.5, 24 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, LDAC, SSC | GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1I, B1C), Galileo (E1), QZSS (L1), | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+ | DRM Widevine L1 | IP68 | USB Copy Test: 36.17 MB/s (connected to Samsung Portable SSD T7 (USB 3.2 Gen. 2), Supported File Systems for external storages: NTFS (read only), FAT32, exFAT | Body-SAR: 1.073 W/kg, Head-SAR: 0.704 W/kg | max. charging speed: 45 W (wired)
Biometric security: optical fingerprint, 2D facial recognition | Vibration motor: linear | Telephony features: Dual-Nano-SIM, Dual-eSIM, Wi-Fi Calling, VoLTE, Vo5G
Update Policy: 6 years Android-Updates (till 03/2032), 6 years security patches (till 03/2032), fanless, waterproofReleased03/25/2026Weight179 g
Price589 EuroLinksSamsung notebook sectionNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
机身——Galaxy A57 具备更高的IP防护等级和更纤薄的设计当你第一次拿起三星 Galaxy A57 5G 时，立刻会注意到它多么纤薄轻巧。三星官方标称其厚度为 6.9 毫米；我们实测仅为 6.8 毫米，不过算上凸起的摄像头，厚度可达 9.85 毫米。 哑光铝制边框赋予其极高的质感，不过玻璃背板却是一如既往的“指纹磁铁”。与正面一样，背板采用的是耐用的康宁大猩猩 Victus+ 玻璃。
其做工质感彰显出真正的高端品质；只有在仔细观察时，才会发现后盖玻璃与周围边框之间的缝隙在角落处并不完全均匀。Galaxy A57在尝试弯曲时毫无声响，且展现出相当强的抗弯韧性。
三星已提升了这款智能手机的IP防护等级，现已通过IP68认证，这意味着它不仅防尘，而且在长时间浸入清水中（深度不超过1.5米，持续至少30分钟）时仍能保持防水性能。 该机型提供炫酷灰、冰蓝、淡紫和海军蓝四种配色。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
ⓘ Daniel Schmidtⓘ Daniel Schmidtⓘ Daniel Schmidtⓘ Daniel Schmidtⓘ Daniel Schmidtⓘ Daniel Schmidt
尺寸对比
Nothing Phone (4a) Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Samsung Galaxy A57 Honor 600 Google Pixel 10a DIN A6 ❌
特点——与上一代机型相比几乎没有变化其规格与Galaxy A56名义上完全相同；A57搭载了全新的SoC和更先进的通信模块，现已支持蓝牙6.0和Wi-Fi 6E。
这款Galaxy手机仍采用USB 2.0接口，既不支持有线显示输出，也不支持DeX模式。在这方面，Pixel 10a等机型提供了更丰富的功能。
ⓘ Daniel Schmidt顶部：麦克风ⓘ Daniel Schmidt左侧：
ⓘ Daniel Schmidt右侧：音量键、电源/功能键ⓘ Daniel Schmidt底部：扬声器、USB接口、麦克风、SIM卡槽
软件——Galaxy A系列，提供六年系统更新Galaxy A57 5G 预装了 Android 16 系统和三星的 One UI 8.5 用户界面。预计该机型将在未来六年内持续获得安全补丁和功能更新。
在 AI 功能方面，与 S 系列及其 其前代机型相比，A57的AI功能已大幅缩减。遗憾的是，三星预装了更多第三方应用，其中现在包括Netto、TikTok和Temu等。不过，这仅仅是个小麻烦，因为这些应用可以完全卸载。
可持续发展Galaxy A57采用纤薄且不含塑料的包装。其可持续性信息虽不如Galaxy S系列全面，但比同价位竞品更为详尽。相关信息可查阅的EPREL数据库、产品网站 （规格 / 生态设计）以及综合可持续发展报告中。
Galaxy A57 5G 参与了“自助维修计划”，用户可参照随附的分步指南，自行更换许多部件。
通信与GNSS——Galaxy A57支持6 GHz Wi-Fi在三星 Galaxy A57 5G 上，移动数据连接在 5G 网络下的表现最佳。虽然支持的频段范围尚可，但对于经常出国旅行的用户而言，这方面的表现并不尽如人意。在城市地区，信号接收效果极佳，无可挑剔。
在 Wi-Fi 方面，三星终于增加了对 6 GHz 频段的支持，但仍未搭载 Wi-Fi 7。我们的测试还显示，其传输速度并非顶尖水平。
NetworkingSamsung Galaxy A57Wi-Fi 6E iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
994 (min: 958) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
919 (min: 778) MBit/s ∼66%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be iperf3 transmit AXE11000
949 (min: 926) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
930 (min: 904) MBit/s ∼84%
Honor 600802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1776 (min: 863) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1102 (min: 187) MBit/s ∼100%
Google Pixel 10aWi-Fi 6E iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U
743 (min: 711) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U
853 (min: 681) MBit/s ∼52%
Nothing Phone (4a)802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax iperf3 transmit AXE11000
949 (min: 930) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
830 (min: 787) MBit/s ∼75%
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax iperf3 transmit AXE11000
308 (min: 226) MBit/s ∼17%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
482 (min: 215) MBit/s ∼44%
Average Wi-Fi 6E iperf3 transmit AXE11000
954 (min: 227) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
940 (min: 442) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1371 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1335 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U
1411 (min: 743) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U
1484 (min: 853) MBit/s ∼90%
Average of class Smartphone iperf3 transmit AXE11000
655 (min: 52.5) MBit/s ∼37%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
689 (min: 52.2) MBit/s ∼63%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1227 (min: 287) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1402 (min: 339) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U
1792 (min: 328) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U
1643 (min: 316) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A57 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø994 (958-1015) MBit/sSamsung Galaxy A57 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø919 (778-943) MBit/sXiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø949 (926-976) MBit/sXiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø929 (904-951) MBit/sGoogle Pixel 10a Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U; iperf 3.1.3, 6 GHz: Ø742 (711-753) MBit/sGoogle Pixel 10a Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U; iperf 3.1.3, 6 GHz: Ø853 (681-902) MBit/s
户外大楼内部
在室内，卫星定位需要相当长的时间，但随后能锁定一个相当精确的位置。在室外，定位速度要快得多，精度约为1米。
在骑行过程中，我们将三星Galaxy A57与 华为 Watch Fit 5 Pro进行了对比。我们注意到，尽管这款智能手机仅采用单频GNSS，但其定位更新频率较低，却依然相当精准。因此，A57非常适合用于导航任务。
GNSS 测试运行：湖泊GNSS 测试运行：城市GNSS 测试运行：总结
手机功能与通话质量——配备双eSIM的A57三星 Galaxy A57 5G 支持两张 nano-SIM 卡或两张 eSIM 卡；也可混合使用。贴耳通话时，通话音质自然且杂音较少。降噪功能表现良好，能有效过滤大量背景噪音；但在嘈杂的环境中，用户的声音会显得有些闷。
在免提模式下，通话对方的声音略显闷沉，但始终清晰易懂。麦克风的拾音范围尚可，但与手机的距离不宜超过两米。
相机——Galaxy A57 配备出色的主摄像头用 Galaxy A57 自拍与上一代机型相比，三星对摄像头进行了一些微调，但并未做出重大改动。前置摄像头拍摄效果不错，不过锐化处理得略微过头了。 视频可支持以30帧/秒的帧率录制Ultra HD格式；若想使用60帧/秒，则需切换至全高清（Full HD）模式。
后置摄像头的成像质量稳健，但考虑到三星为Galaxy A57 5G定位的价格区间，这还不够理想。在我们的测试样张中，我们注意到图像中的高光区域有时会出现过曝，而且景深表现还有提升空间。 不过，我们很喜欢它的色彩校准效果。变焦仅支持数字变焦，在4倍放大范围内尚可使用；但超过这个倍数后，画质会急剧下降，10倍变焦时已达到极限。
额外的超广角镜头虽为12 MPix，但细节不足，边缘区域会出现像素化现象。第三个镜头是性能较弱的微距镜头，成像效果仅属一般。
Galaxy A57支持以30 FPS录制Ultra HD视频，或以最高60 FPS录制Full HD视频。 通过慢动作功能可实现更高的帧率（240 FPS），但分辨率仅限于720p。光学防抖功能能有效减少相机抖动，麦克风录制的音频也相当清晰。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide-angle5x ZoomLow-Lightclick to load imagesSamsung Galaxy A57 5GGoogle Pixel 10aNothing Phone (4a) ProCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesSamsung Galaxy A57 5GGoogle Pixel 10aNothing Phone (4a) ProCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesSamsung Galaxy A57 5GGoogle Pixel 10aNothing Phone (4a) ProCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesSamsung Galaxy A57 5GGoogle Pixel 10aNothing Phone (4a) ProCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesSamsung Galaxy A57 5GGoogle Pixel 10aNothing Phone (4a) ProCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x
在受控的照明条件下，三星 Galaxy A57 5G 的色彩显示自然，没有异常。
我们的测试图表在中心区域呈现得清晰锐利——但不会过于锐利——然而越往边缘，画面就越模糊。
3.4 ∆E5.3 ∆E2.6 ∆E6.6 ∆E1.6 ∆E5.2 ∆E5.5 ∆E3.4 ∆E6.8 ∆E4.5 ∆E3.1 ∆E3.6 ∆E4 ∆E5.7 ∆E4.8 ∆E4.2 ∆E5.2 ∆E5.3 ∆E7.3 ∆E3.5 ∆E1.7 ∆E1.5 ∆E1.3 ∆E4.2 ∆EColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A57: 4.18 ∆E min: 1.28 - max: 7.33 ∆E11.2 ∆E13.3 ∆E12.9 ∆E11.7 ∆E18.3 ∆E13.4 ∆E16.4 ∆E10.9 ∆E13.8 ∆E14.2 ∆E13 ∆E20.6 ∆E11.9 ∆E10.7 ∆E10.2 ∆E15.1 ∆E17.8 ∆E16.1 ∆E18.6 ∆E15.6 ∆E17.5 ∆E19.1 ∆E16.5 ∆E12.3 ∆EColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A57: 14.63 ∆E min: 10.23 - max: 20.59 ∆E
Samsung Galaxy A57Samsung Galaxy A57
配件与保修——Galaxy A57 简约版包装内容三星 Galaxy A57 仅随附一条 USB 数据线（两端均为 Type-C 接口）和一枚 SIM 卡弹出针。三星在其官方网店提供可选的手机壳和电源适配器，第三方供应商也提供兼容的配件。
在德国，该机的保修期为24个月，可通过购买Care+保险套餐延长保修期，该套餐两年费用为99或119欧元，具体金额取决于保障范围；后者还涵盖盗窃和丢失。此外，用户也可选择每月支付5或6欧元。
输入与操作——板载光学指纹传感器Galaxy A57 的电容式触摸屏滑动体验极佳，且能在整个屏幕范围内精准识别输入。光学指纹传感器集成在显示屏中，位置紧邻底部边缘。只要手指在传感器上停留时间足够长，识别率就相当不错，不过响应速度还可以再快一点。 此外，还提供了一种安全性较低的前置摄像头解锁方式。
线性振动马达能提供清晰的震动反馈，并在设置中支持多种自定义方式。功能键也可根据个人需求进行优化，并可作为传统的电源键使用。
显示屏——三星继续在低频下采用PWM技术亚像素结构三星 Galaxy A57 的显示屏在规格上与 A56 基本相同，我们的测量结果也证实了这一点。背光效果极佳，亮度可达到相当高的水平；我们测得的峰值亮度为1,980 cd/m²。虽然这一表现不错，但竞品机型的屏幕亮度明显更高。
Galaxy A57 的 Super AMOLED 面板采用脉冲宽度调制（PWM）技术来控制亮度。虽然在最低亮度下调制幅度保持平稳，但频率仅为 240 Hz，因此对光敏感的用户在长时间使用时可能会感到不适。
1132cd/m²1138cd/m²1136cd/m²1142cd/m²1135cd/m²1136cd/m²1130cd/m²1128cd/m²1129cd/m²
Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 3Maximum: 1142 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1134 cd/m² Minimum: 2.03 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 99 %Center on Battery: 1135 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.7 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.69}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.94}99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)Gamma: 2.08CCT: 6578 K
Samsung Galaxy A57Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxAMOLED, 2772x1280, 6.8"Honor 600AMOLED, 2728x1264, 6.6"Google Pixel 10apOLED, 2424x1080, 6.3"Nothing Phone (4a)AMOLED, 2720x1224, 6.8"Motorola Edge 70 FusionAMOLED, 2772x1272, 6.8"Display83%188%54%-27%92% APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²)19203582 87%3102 62%3050 59%1455 -24%3775 97% HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²)19803538 79%8192 314%2925 48%1403 -29%3685 86%Response Times22%13%-1%-190%-7% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)1.21 ?(0.59, 0.622)0.8 ?(0.4215, 0.374) 34%1.06 ?(0.3275, 0.733) 12%1.42 ?(0.562, 0.859) -17%8.18 ?(0.3435, 7.836) -576%1.4 ?(0.7, 0.7) -16% Response Time Black / White * (ms)1.1 ?(0.543, 0.5595)0.952 ?(0.484, 0.468) 13%1 ?(0.46, 0.535) 9%1.07 ?(0.556, 0.51) 3%0.99 ?(0.497, 0.49) 10%1.2 ?(0.6, 0.6) -9% PWM Frequency (Hz)2401206024090120 PWM Amplitude * (%)16.7213.45 20%13.86 17%14.71 12%17.49 -5%16 4%Screen1%-53%27%-26%-9%Brightness middle (cd/m²)11351107 -2%1787 57%2205 94%1536 35%1501 32%Brightness (cd/m²)11341110 -2%1538 36%1476 30%Brightness Distribution (%)9997 -2%97 -2%96 -3%Black Level * (cd/m²)Colorchecker dE 2000 *1.71 41%1.9 -12%1.4 18%2.6 -53%1.52 11%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *2.52.7 -8%5.3 -112%2.3 8%5.7 -128%3.47 -39%Greyscale dE 2000 *1.41.7 -21%3.4 -143%1.6 -14%2 -43%2.6 -86%Gamma2.08 106%2.25 98%2.25 98%2.23 99%2.24 98%2.184 101%CCT6578 99%6498 100%6874 95%6715 97%6878 95%6444 101%Total Average (Program / Settings)35% /
22%49% /
23%27% /
23%-81% /
-71%25% /
10%* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 HzAmplitude: 16.72 %The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .
The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7597 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
min.25%50%75%100%
在固定缩放级别下，采用不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量（尽管在最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来呈平坦状，但这实际上是缩放比例造成的。信息框中显示的是最低亮度下振幅曲线的放大图。）
在 Galaxy A57 的设置中选择“自然”显示模式时，Calman 认证该款三星智能手机能够实现准确的色彩还原。在默认的“鲜艳”模式下，屏幕显示的色调明显偏冷。
灰度（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）颜色（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）饱和度（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White1.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.543 ms rise↘ 0.5595 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.6 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey1.21 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.59 ms rise↘ 0.622 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.7 ms).
在户外，Galaxy A57 的表现相当出色。在大多数光线条件下，屏幕内容依然清晰易读，不过在阳光明媚的日子里，亮度或许可以再高一些。
ⓘ Daniel Schmidt在阳光下ⓘ Daniel Schmidt在树荫下
该面板的可视角度稳定性良好，但即使视角稍有变化，亮度也会明显下降，同时还会出现明显的蓝调色偏。
三星 Galaxy A57 5G 的可视角度性能——Galaxy A57 搭载 Exynos 1680 处理器Galaxy A57 5G 搭载了三星自主研发的 SoC—— Exynos 1680。该机型最高可支持 8 GB LPDDR5x 内存——而 512 GB 版本甚至配备了 12 GB 内存。这使得该智能手机在日常使用中表现出色。
其 CPU 在多核性能方面表现尤为出色，比 Exynos 1580（前代机型所采用的芯片）高出16%。在AI加速方面，1680属于中端水平。
Geekbench 6.7 | Antutu v11 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark Geekbench 6.7
Single-CoreXiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxMediatek Dimensity 9500s, Immortalis-G925 MC11, 12288
2673 Points +94%Average of class Smartphone (196 - 4733, n=185, last 2 years)
1866 Points +35%Google Pixel 10aGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1682 Points +22%Samsung Galaxy A57Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192
1378 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1)
1378 Points 0%Honor 600Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 8192
1317 Points -4%Nothing Phone (4a)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288
1259 Points -9%Motorola Edge 70 FusionQualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
1171 Points -15% Multi-CoreXiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxMediatek Dimensity 9500s, Immortalis-G925 MC11, 12288
8419 Points +87%Average of class Smartphone (830 - 12854, n=185, last 2 years)
5667 Points +26%Samsung Galaxy A57Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192
4509 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1)
4509 Points 0%Google Pixel 10aGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
4309 Points -4%Honor 600Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 8192
4051 Points -10%Nothing Phone (4a)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288
3393 Points -25%Motorola Edge 70 FusionQualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
3309 Points -27%Antutu v11 - Score
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxMediatek Dimensity 9500s, Immortalis-G925 MC11, 12288
2809071 Points +99%Average of class Smartphone (519159 - 4450644, n=45, last 2 years)
2449165 Points +73%Samsung Galaxy A57Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192
1414040 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1)
1414040 Points 0%PCMark for Android - Work 3.x
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxMediatek Dimensity 9500s, Immortalis-G925 MC11, 12288
16481 Points +9%Samsung Galaxy A57Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192
15108 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1)
15108 Points 0%Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=128, last 2 years)
14916 Points -1%CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (376 - 2856, n=104, last 2 years)
1233 Points +45%Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxMediatek Dimensity 9500s, Immortalis-G925 MC11, 12288
1192 Points +40%Honor 600Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 8192
1095 Points +29%Google Pixel 10aGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1008 Points +18%Samsung Galaxy A57Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192
851 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1)
851 Points 0%Motorola Edge 70 FusionQualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
753 Points -12%Nothing Phone (4a)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288
726 Points -15%BaseMark OS II
OverallXiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxMediatek Dimensity 9500s, Immortalis-G925 MC11, 12288
11948 Points +77%Average of class Smartphone (1885 - 16690, n=110, last 2 years)
7945 Points +18%Samsung Galaxy A57Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192
6737 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1)
6737 Points 0%Nothing Phone (4a)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288
5610 Points -17% SystemXiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxMediatek Dimensity 9500s, Immortalis-G925 MC11, 12288
15404 Points +50%Average of class Smartphone (4117 - 21153, n=110, last 2 years)
11518 Points +12%Samsung Galaxy A57Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192
10270 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1)
10270 Points 0%Nothing Phone (4a)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288
8526 Points -17% MemoryXiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxMediatek Dimensity 9500s, Immortalis-G925 MC11, 12288
12125 Points +45%Average of class Smartphone (2760 - 24052, n=110, last 2 years)
9377 Points +12%Samsung Galaxy A57Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192
8343 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1)
8343 Points 0%Nothing Phone (4a)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288
7679 Points -8% GraphicsXiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxMediatek Dimensity 9500s, Immortalis-G925 MC11, 12288
50403 Points +277%Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 61797, n=110, last 2 years)
24717 Points +85%Samsung Galaxy A57Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192
13352 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1)
13352 Points 0%Nothing Phone (4a)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288
9405 Points -30% WebXiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxMediatek Dimensity 9500s, Immortalis-G925 MC11, 12288
2165 Points +20%Samsung Galaxy A57Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192
1801 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1)
1801 Points 0%Average of class Smartphone (1062 - 2587, n=110, last 2 years)
1737 Points -4%Nothing Phone (4a)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288
1609 Points -11%UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxMediatek Dimensity 9500s, Immortalis-G925 MC11, 12288
66164 Points +457%Average of class Smartphone (2895 - 66164, n=96, last 2 years)
18948 Points +60%Samsung Galaxy A57Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192
11868 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1)
11868 Points 0%AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxMediatek Dimensity 9500s, Immortalis-G925 MC11, 12288
41402 Points +3920%Average of class Smartphone (293 - 307528, n=64, last 2 years)
14456 Points +1303%Samsung Galaxy A57Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192
1030 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1)
1030 Points 0%Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.7Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxMediatek Dimensity 9500s, Immortalis-G925 MC11, 12288
1121 Points +295%Average of class Smartphone (80 - 6997, n=134, last 2 years)
542 Points +91%Google Pixel 10aGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
386 Points +36%Samsung Galaxy A57Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192
284 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1)
284 Points 0%Honor 600Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 8192
273 Points -4%Nothing Phone (4a)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288
247 Points -13%Motorola Edge 70 FusionQualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
235 Points -17% Half Precision NPU 1.7Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxMediatek Dimensity 9500s, Immortalis-G925 MC11, 12288
8669 Points +2952%Google Pixel 10aGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
4973 Points +1651%Average of class Smartphone (80 - 55067, n=134, last 2 years)
1769 Points +523%Samsung Galaxy A57Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192
284 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1)
284 Points 0%Honor 600Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 8192
275 Points -3%Nothing Phone (4a)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288
249 Points -12%Motorola Edge 70 FusionQualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
235 Points -17% Quantized NPU 1.7Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxMediatek Dimensity 9500s, Immortalis-G925 MC11, 12288
11949 Points +1776%Google Pixel 10aGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
9392 Points +1374%Average of class Smartphone (124 - 71367, n=134, last 2 years)
2681 Points +321%Samsung Galaxy A57Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192
637 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1)
637 Points 0%Honor 600Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 8192
633 Points -1%Nothing Phone (4a)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288
581 Points -9%Motorola Edge 70 FusionQualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
547 Points -14%AI Benchmark - Score V5
Average of class Smartphone (46.4 - 3334, n=16, last 2 years)
393 Points +207%Samsung Galaxy A57Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192
128 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1)
128 Points 0%
图形计算由集成的 Xclipse 550负责。尽管它比 Adreno 810要领先许多，但其性能仍明显逊于 Adreno 722。
3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxImmortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
6300 Points +267%Google Pixel 10aMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2660 Points +55%Honor 600Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2043 Points +19%Samsung Galaxy A57Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1718 Points Nothing Phone (4a)Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1115 Points -35%Motorola Edge 70 FusionAdreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1114 Points -35%3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxImmortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
6166 Points +258%Google Pixel 10aMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2695 Points +57%Honor 600Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2064 Points +20%Samsung Galaxy A57Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1721 Points Motorola Edge 70 FusionAdreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1148 Points -33%Nothing Phone (4a)Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1118 Points -35%3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxImmortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
21390 Points +248%Google Pixel 10aMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9702 Points +58%Honor 600Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7561 Points +23%Samsung Galaxy A57Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6154 Points Nothing Phone (4a)Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4372 Points -29%Motorola Edge 70 FusionAdreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4297 Points -30%3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxImmortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2263 Points +189%Google Pixel 10aMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1104 Points +41%Samsung Galaxy A57Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
784 Points Honor 600Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
761 Points -3%Nothing Phone (4a)Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
401 Points -49%3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxImmortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2310 Points +199%Google Pixel 10aMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1091 Points +41%Samsung Galaxy A57Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
772 Points Honor 600Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
761 Points -1%Nothing Phone (4a)Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
408 Points -47%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxImmortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps +1%Samsung Galaxy A57Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxImmortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
778 fps +335%Samsung Galaxy A57Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
179 fps GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxImmortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps +32%Samsung Galaxy A57Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
91 fps GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxImmortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
379 fps +261%Samsung Galaxy A57Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
105 fps GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxImmortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps +71%Samsung Galaxy A57Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
70 fps GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxImmortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
267 fps +230%Samsung Galaxy A57Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxImmortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
112 fps +160%Google Pixel 10aMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +40%Samsung Galaxy A57Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxImmortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
152 fps +210%Google Pixel 10aMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
91 fps +86%Samsung Galaxy A57Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxImmortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
103 fps +140%Google Pixel 10aMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps +37%Samsung Galaxy A57Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps Honor 600Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps -9%Nothing Phone (4a)Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
24 fps -44%Motorola Edge 70 FusionAdreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20.3 fps -53%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxImmortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
91 fps +168%Google Pixel 10aMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps +29%Honor 600Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps +6%Samsung Galaxy A57Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps Nothing Phone (4a)Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps -38%Motorola Edge 70 FusionAdreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19.1 fps -44%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxImmortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps +111%Google Pixel 10aMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +5%Honor 600Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +5%Samsung Galaxy A57Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps Motorola Edge 70 FusionAdreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps -32%Nothing Phone (4a)Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
38 fps -33%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxImmortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
277 fps +285%Google Pixel 10aMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +67%Honor 600Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
96 fps +33%Samsung Galaxy A57Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
72 fps Nothing Phone (4a)Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps -24%Motorola Edge 70 FusionAdreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47 fps -35%GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxImmortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
49 fps +250%Google Pixel 10aMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps +43%Honor 600Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps +14%Samsung Galaxy A57Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps Nothing Phone (4a)Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.4 fps -33%Motorola Edge 70 FusionAdreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8.9 fps -36%
Galaxy A57 的浏览器性能表现良好，上网体验非常流畅。
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 5 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 Jetstream 2
2.0 TotalXiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max (Chrome 147)
187.393 Points +5%Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149)
178.3 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1)
178.3 Points 0%Average of class Smartphone (63.9 - 423, n=113, last 2 years)
154.1 Points -14%Motorola Edge 70 Fusion (Chrome 146)
152.9 Points -14% 2.2 TotalGoogle Pixel 10a (Chrome 149)
222.755 Points +9%Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max (Chrome 147)
215.551 Points +6%Average of class Smartphone (2 - 480, n=104, last 2 years)
205 Points +1%Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1)
204 Points 0%Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149)
203.905 Points Nothing Phone (4a) (Chrome 147)
197.209 Points -3%Honor 600 (Chrome 149)
147.651 Points -28%Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max (Chrome 147)
282 runs/min +19%Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149)
236 runs/min Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1)
236 runs/min 0%Average of class Smartphone (49.3 - 733, n=70, last 2 years)
225 runs/min -5%Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max (Chrome 147)
17.6 runs/min +19%Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149)
14.8 runs/min Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1)
14.8 runs/min 0%Average of class Smartphone (3.06 - 56.5, n=79, last 2 years)
14.6 runs/min -1%WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max (Chrome 147)
162 Points +2%Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149)
159 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1)
159 Points 0%Average of class Smartphone (56 - 278, n=87, last 2 years)
132.7 Points -17%WebXPRT 5 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 139, n=27, last 2 years)
55 Points +15%Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149)
48 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1)
48 Points 0%Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max (Chrome 147)
40 Points -17%Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149)
55771 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1)
55771 Points 0%Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max (Chrome 147)
54309 Points -3%Average of class Smartphone (6015 - 160221, n=131, last 2 years)
50928 Points -9%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (216 - 2718, n=118, last 2 years)
858 ms * -10%Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1)
777 ms * -0%Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149)
776.8 ms * Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max (Chrome 147)
739 ms * +5%* ... smaller is better
这款三星智能手机配备的高速 UFS 3.1 存储器虽然速度很快，但比采用此类存储器的普通智能手机稍慢一些，尤其是在写入小数据块时。不过，在日常使用中，这一点并不会造成明显的问题。
Samsung Galaxy A57Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxHonor 600Google Pixel 10aNothing Phone (4a)Motorola Edge 70 FusionAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class SmartphoneAndroBench 3-529%81%49%47%82%37%70% Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)1683.072067.34 23%1986.99 18%1689.27 0%2003.93 19%2049.4 22%1775 ?(950 - 3497, n=127) 5%2264 ?(270 - 4370, n=176, last 2 years) 35% Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)1119.111942.35 74%1807.77 62%826.38 -26%1596.2 43%1825.9 63%1247 ?(166.8 - 2674, n=127) 11%1966 ?(152.2 - 4113, n=176, last 2 years) 76% Random Read 4KB (MB/s)249.83366.17 47%353.95 42%326.53 31%263.22 5%351.2 41%290 ?(173.5 - 543, n=127) 16%316 ?(47.6 - 614, n=176, last 2 years) 26% Random Write 4KB (MB/s)149.04108.21 -27%451 203%430.37 189%325.75 119%452.1 203%319 ?(62.6 - 548, n=128) 114%362 ?(13.1 - 1071, n=176, last 2 years) 143%
游戏——不适合发烧友使用GameBench，我们在三星Galaxy A57 5G上测试了几款精选游戏——这款手机并非专为游戏而生的性能怪兽。虽然测试中获得的帧率表现始终稳定良好，但通常需要降低画质等级，否则甚至无法启用更高的显示质量。 例如，《绝地求生》中无法启用“超高清”画质设置，《原神》会出现卡顿现象，且在高帧率运行时，手机会变得非常烫手。
对于A57来说，休闲游戏完全不成问题，但喜欢玩第一人称射击游戏或画面要求较高的游戏的用户，恐怕不会对这款三星手机完全满意。
《绝地求生：刺激战场》原神
Samsung Galaxy A57; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø41.1 (32-53) fpsSamsung Galaxy A57; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 6.7.0_45486583_45768959: Ø33.1 (27-43) fpsSamsung Galaxy A57; League of Legends: Wild Rift: Ø116.8 (80-120) fpsSamsung Galaxy A57; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø73.9 (55-87) fpsSamsung Galaxy A57; PUBG Mobile; HD; 4.4.0: Ø39.7 (35-41) fps
排放量——Exynos 1680 几乎未减少排放温度在持续高负载运行下，Galaxy A57 的表面温度可能会显著升高，导致设备的大面积区域温度升至 40 °C 以上；不过，这种情况既不会让人感到不适，也不必担心。
在 3DMark 压力测试中，其表现基本保持稳定，性能仅有轻微下降；在最新的 Steel Nomad Light 测试中，性能表现甚至十分稳定。
Max. LoadIdle
47 °C44.8 °C42 °C46.5 °C43.1 °C40 °C45 °C44.8 °C38.4 °C
Maximum: 47 °CAverage: 43.5 °C
41.3 °C44.6 °C47.8 °C39.3 °C43.4 °C47.2 °C37.3 °C43.4 °C47.2 °C
Maximum: 47.8 °CAverage: 43.5 °C Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle
30.7 °C30.7 °C30.3 °C30.6 °C30.2 °C31.6 °C30.8 °C30.7 °C30.1 °C
Maximum: 31.6 °CAverage: 30.6 °C
29.4 °C29.7 °C30.1 °C29.8 °C29.7 °C30.3 °C29.5 °C29.2 °C30.4 °C
Maximum: 30.4 °CAverage: 29.8 °C Room Temperature 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.8 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test StabilityNothing Phone (4a)Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.5 % +10%Motorola Edge 70 FusionAdreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97.7 % +8%Honor 600Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95.2 % +5%Samsung Galaxy A57Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90.3 % Google Pixel 10aMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66.4 % -26%Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxImmortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
51 % -44% Wild Life Extreme Stress TestNothing Phone (4a)Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.7 % +7%Honor 600Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95.3 % +2%Samsung Galaxy A57Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
93.4 % Motorola Edge 70 FusionAdreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90.4 % -3%Google Pixel 10aMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68.7 % -26%Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxImmortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
59.9 % -36% Steel Nomad Light Stress Test StabilityHonor 600Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.4 % 0%Samsung Galaxy A57Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.2 % Nothing Phone (4a)Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.8 % 0%Google Pixel 10aMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76.9 % -22%Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxImmortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
72.7 % -27%
Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø10.2 (9.65-10.3) %Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Immortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø25 (22.6-37.8) %Google Pixel 10a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø12.7 (11-16) %Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø35.6 (33-36.5) %Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Immortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø80.7 (60.2-118) %Google Pixel 10a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø45.8 (37.9-57.1) %Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø5.72 (5.69-5.73) %Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Immortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø13.3 (12.5-17.2) %Google Pixel 10a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø7.02 (6.23-8.1) %
演讲者尽管这款智能手机机身纤薄，但三星Galaxy A57上的两个扬声器仍能提供不错的音质。不过，低音略显单薄，且在最大音量下，声音会变得相当刺耳。
一如既往，三星在蓝牙编解码器方面略显吝啬，但该机确实支持SSC。借助“双音频”功能，您可以同时连接两副耳机或两组扬声器，不过此时仅使用SBC编解码器。有线耳机可通过USB接口连接。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Samsung Galaxy A57 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.1 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)Compared to same class» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 90% worse» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 136%Compared to all devices tested» 26% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 69% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Google Pixel 10a audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.6% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)Compared to same class» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 136%Compared to all devices tested» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
电池续航时间——Galaxy A57 配备 5,000 mAh 电池功耗在满载运行且屏幕亮度调至最低时，Galaxy A57 的功耗处于合理水平，但在屏幕亮度调至最大时，功耗会略有增加。
这款三星智能手机仅支持通过数据线充电，最大充电功率为 45 瓦。在我们的测试中，电池充满电共耗时 71 分钟。
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.07 / 0.56 WattIdle 0.71 / 1.94 / 2.04 Watt
Load
6.19 / 13.67 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy A575000 mAhXiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max8500 mAhHonor 6006400 mAhGoogle Pixel 10a5100 mAhNothing Phone (4a)5080 mAhAverage Samsung Exynos 1680 Average of class Smartphone Power Consumption1%-35%34%-16%0%6%Idle Minimum * (Watt)0.711.19 -68%1.24 -75%0.7 1%0.97 -37%0.71 ?(n=1) -0%0.904 ?(0.39 - 1.7, n=134, last 2 years) -27%Idle Average * (Watt)1.941.23 37%2.28 -18%0.94 52%2.07 -7%1.94 ?(n=1) -0%1.481 ?(0.7 - 4.36, n=134, last 2 years) 24%Idle Maximum * (Watt)2.041.43 30%2.3 -13%1.03 50%2.13 -4%2.04 ?(n=1) -0%1.678 ?(0.75 - 4.46, n=134, last 2 years) 18%Load Average * (Watt)6.196.8 -10%6.19 ?(n=1) -0%6.67 ?(2.9 - 14.9, n=86, last 2 years) -8%Load Maximum * (Watt)13.6711.45 16%13.7 ?(n=1) -0%10.6 ?(4.75 - 22, n=86, last 2 years) 22%* ... smaller is better
功耗：Geekbench（150 cd/m²）
Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.65 (1.079-10.1) WattSamsung Galaxy A56 5G Samsung Exynos 1580; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.54 (1.012-11) WattSamsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.286 (1.228-1.439) WattSamsung Galaxy A56 5G Samsung Exynos 1580; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.067 (1.034-1.349) Watt
功耗：GFXbench（150 cd/m²）
Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.01 (5.62-6.36) WattSamsung Galaxy A56 5G Samsung Exynos 1580; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.04 (5.72-7.42) WattSamsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.286 (1.228-1.439) WattSamsung Galaxy A56 5G Samsung Exynos 1580; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.067 (1.034-1.349) Watt
电池续航时间三星 Galaxy A57 的电池续航时间出人意料地短，尤其是与前代机型相比——尽管两者的电池容量相同，但 A57 的续航时间却明显更短。
在此次对比中，A57 排名垫底。希望三星能在未来的更新中解决这个问题。
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
39h 50min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 149)
14h 54min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
26h 50min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 35min
Samsung Galaxy A575000 mAhXiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max8500 mAhHonor 6006400 mAhGoogle Pixel 10a5100 mAhNothing Phone (4a)5080 mAhMotorola Edge 70 Fusion7000 mAhSamsung Galaxy A56 5G5000 mAhBattery runtime20%52%34%21%38%31%Reader / Idle (h)39.835.2 -12%39.3 -1%52.9 33%H.264 (h)26.832 19%41.8 56%WiFi v1.3 (h)14.923.2 56%22.6 52%20 34%18 21%24.5 64%20 34%Load (h)3.64.2 17%5.4 50%3.6 0%
Notebookcheck 综合评分三星 Galaxy A57 5G 凭借其精良的做工、稳定的日常性能以及长期的软件支持给人留下了深刻印象，但由于续航能力较差、相较前代机型改进有限，以及建议零售价偏高，未能充分发挥其潜力。
Back to the verdict
Samsung Galaxy A57
- 07/09/2026 v8
Daniel Schmidt
Chassis93%
Keyboard67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device92%
Connectivity51 / 69 → 74%
Weight91 / 50-100 → 81%
Battery90%
Display91%
Games Performance24 / 55 → 44%
Application Performance66 / 85 → 78%
AI Performance16%
Temperature83%
Noise100%
Audio78 / 90 → 86%
Camera75%
Average76%
82%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions92.5%Materials50%Packaging95%Power Use93.4%Repairability60%Software Updates100% Total Sustainability Score: 81.8%
可能方案的比较
ImageModel / ReviewPriceWeightDriveDisplay
1.81.5%Samsung Galaxy A57Samsung Exynos 1680 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 550 ⎘8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1List Price: 589€179 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2340x1080385 PPISuper AMOLED
2.85.6%Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxMediatek Dimensity 9500s ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G925 MC11 ⎘12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.xAmazon: $489.99List Price: 470€218 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.83"2772x1280447 PPIAMOLED
3.82.8%Honor 600Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 722 ⎘8 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 3.1Amazon: $729.00List Price: 650€185 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.57"2728x1264458 PPIAMOLED
4.85.3%Google Pixel 10aGoogle Tensor G4 ⎘ ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 3.1List Price: 549€183 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.30"2424x1080421 PPIpOLED
5.78.6%Nothing Phone (4a)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1List Price: 429€204.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.78"2720x1224440 PPIAMOLED
6.77.4%Motorola Edge 70 FusionQualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1List Price: 420€193 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.78"2772x1272450 PPIAMOLED
TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
More articles related to this deviceSamsung Galaxy A57 (Galaxy A50 Series)News•三星 Galaxy A58 5G：这些是我们希望看到的改进 |News•三星 Galaxy A57 5G：细节优化，却存在意想不到的短板 |News•这是最薄的中端智能手机吗？ |News•三星Galaxy A37 和Galaxy A57 出现在官方外观图片中 |News•三星Galaxy A57：首批实物图片显示了设计和新的颜色选择 Related Articles
三星 Galaxy A58 5G：这些是我们希望看到的改进
07/14/2026
三星 Galaxy A57 5G：细节优化，却存在意想不到的短板
07/13/2026
表现强劲，但竞争对手也在紧追不舍——三星Galaxy A37 5G评测
06/27/2026
以下是Galaxy A37的最佳替代机型
06/26/2026
中端产品综述：Nothing Phone (4a) Pro vs.Galaxy A57 和Redmi Note 15 Pro+
05/12/2026
三星Galaxy A57
03/30/2026
Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Translation Sections Manager - 869529 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via: